Skip to main content

Emergency communication for senior care

Because help should never be uncertain.

OshriKa is developing a response workflow that routes alerts to configured staff, escalates when an alert is unanswered, records acknowledgement, and supports AI-assisted documentation for staff review.

Evaluation-led. Site and configuration requirements are confirmed before deployment.

System view

Device to reviewed record

Conceptual workflow
  1. Resident device

    01
    A wearable or wall device starts the intended alert path.
  2. Facility gateway

    02
    The site survey confirms gateway placement and coverage needs.
  3. Local OshriKa system

    03
    Routing is designed around the facility configuration.
  4. Assigned staff device

    04
    The configured staff workflow receives the alert first.
  5. Badge or fob acknowledgement

    05
    The intended record captures who acknowledged the alert.
  6. Response record

    06
    The timeline supports AI-assisted documentation for staff review.
Intended response path. Deployment-specific behaviour requires technical and site verification.
Built in Nova Scotia
Designed for local operation
Wireless placement planned by site survey
Configured routing and acknowledgement
No per-seat alert licensing

Response workflow

From alert to reviewed record

One intended path connects routing, escalation, acknowledgement, and AI-assisted documentation for staff review.

  1. Step 01

    Alert triggered

    A resident wearable or wall device starts the intended response path.

  2. Step 02

    Routed to configured staff

    The facility configuration defines which staff, role, or shift receives the alert first.

  3. Step 03

    Escalated if unanswered

    The next configured step starts when the first alert is not acknowledged.

  4. Step 04

    Acknowledged by staff

    The intended badge or fob workflow records who acknowledged the alert and when.

  5. Step 05

    Prepared for staff review

    The alert timeline supports an AI-assisted documentation draft. Staff review, edit, and approve before sign-off.

Intended workflow shown for evaluation. Product, configuration, and site behaviour require verification.

Buyer paths

Start with the question your role needs answered

Each stakeholder can inspect the same response workflow from a different operational perspective.

How will we review accountability and rollout fit?

Review rollout scope, proposal clarity, acknowledgement records, and the operational record your team can inspect.

View rollout and records

Capabilities

The core evaluation set

Inspect the response path first. The How it works page carries the deeper capability and comparison detail.

Alert routing

When a resident needs help, alerts route to configured staff and escalate automatically if unanswered.

Staged escalation

If the first alert is not acknowledged, OshriKa moves through the facility's configured backup path.

AI assistance

The alert timeline supports an AI-assisted report draft. Staff review, edit, and approve before sign-off.

Device monitoring

The target dashboard keeps battery, signal, and maintenance status visible for staff review.

Local-operation design

Core workflows are designed for local operation. Configuration-specific dependencies are verified before deployment.

Staff tracking

The intended acknowledgement workflow records who responded and supports response-time review.

Implementation path

Rollout starts with workflow fit

A limited validation is planned to run in parallel with the facility's current process before any broader deployment decision.

A limited validation is planned to run beside the current process.

The facility controls alert routing, escalation, and record review.

IT readiness is checked before anyone schedules on-site installation.

Day 30 and Day 90 reviews focus on evidence, blockers, and fit.

  1. 01

    Map workflow

    Map rooms, roles, shifts, current response paths, and where escalation should move if the first alert is not acknowledged.

  2. 02

    Confirm site readiness

    Confirm network, power, gateway or server location, cabling, construction, and any optional voice bridge requirements before installation is scheduled.

  3. 03

    Validate coverage

    Place devices around the facility layout, walk-test coverage, and train staff while the limited validation runs in parallel with the facility's current process.

  4. 04

    Review fit

    Use Day 30 and Day 90 reviews to discuss blockers, evidence, staff questions, device status, and the next appropriate scope.

Privacy and security

Local operation is a design target, not a shortcut

A facility walkthrough should make the proposed data path, external dependencies, access model, and retention boundaries visible before deployment.

Designed for local operation

Core workflows are intended to run on the facility network. External dependencies and offline behaviour are verified for the approved configuration.

Documented data path

The walkthrough identifies approved storage, transfer, access, and support paths before deployment.

Facility policy alignment

Access and retention settings are planned around the facility's policies and signed deployment scope.

Review the privacy approach
Aviad Kohn, founder of OshriKa

Built from experience

Built from senior-care operations experience

OshriKa was created by someone who worked inside a senior care facility and saw how much clarity teams need when an alert moves from notification to response, and how difficult it is to document events later from memory.

Current stage: product development and customer discovery. Any facility evaluation would be limited in scope and planned beside the current process.

Read the origin story

Evaluation checklist

Compare the workflow before booking a walkthrough

Use a practical set of questions to assess emergency communication systems without submitting a form.

View evaluation checklist

Alert routing

01

Escalation timing

02

Staff acknowledgement

03

Device health

04

Frequently asked questions

Questions buyers ask before evaluation

Start with workflow, site readiness, staff review, and the boundaries that need verification.

Start with workflow fit: who receives the alert first, when escalation starts, who acknowledges the response, and what record managers can review afterwards.

A useful walkthrough should also cover IT readiness, staff training, privacy boundaries, support expectations, and whether a limited validation would run alongside your current process.

The intended workflow routes alerts to configured staff devices and starts the next escalation step when an alert is not acknowledged.

Your facility defines the escalation path. An optional voice bridge is available and disabled by default.

OshriKa gives your team a visible response workflow: configured alert routing, staged escalation, staff acknowledgement, and review-ready documentation.

Wireless placement is planned around how your facility operates. A site survey confirms gateway placement, cabling, power, coverage, and construction requirements.

The target architecture keeps core workflows on the facility network. External dependencies, offline behaviour, remote support, and update paths are verified for the approved configuration.

The target workflow supports a web dashboard on approved computers, tablets, or mobile devices connected to the facility network. An optional voice bridge can be evaluated for standard desk phones.

The intended workflow uses the alert timeline to support an AI-assisted incident-report draft.

Plain-English facility queries are part of the target workflow. The approved data scope and transfers require configuration verification.

Staff review, edit, and approve AI-assisted documentation before sign-off.

Facility evaluation

See how OshriKa could fit your facility workflow

Review routing, staged escalation, acknowledgement, documentation boundaries, local-operation targets, site requirements, and validation scope.

OshriKa - Emergency communication for senior care